About the Terri Schiavo Autopsy
Thanks to NewsMax (above link) for doing such a comprehensive analysis of the Terri Schiavo autopsy. It is not surprising that medical professionals disagree on the autopsy results and what could have caused them. Look at any medical procedure, especially one challenged in court, and you'll get the same number of differing opinions as there are plaintiff attorneys. One issue that tells me that the coroner was not accurate concerns her "blindness." It was obvious to my real world eyes that she obviously could follow movement, which was confirmed by doctors who examined her before she was killed. The coroner examined her only after she had been murdered through dehydration. Who are you going to believe, the coroner or your lying eyes? Well, I know what I believe.
Also, on NewsMax (http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/6/19/205259.shtml), a respected Nobel Prize nominated doctor states his opinion that the autopsy conclusions are flawed. His conclusion?
"Ultimately, based on the clinical evidence and the autopsy results, an aware woman was killed."
I remain of the opinion that Terri Schiavo was murdered by her piece of crap "husband" and his willing accomplices were the Florida legal system and the major media.
Also, on NewsMax (http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/6/19/205259.shtml), a respected Nobel Prize nominated doctor states his opinion that the autopsy conclusions are flawed. His conclusion?
"Ultimately, based on the clinical evidence and the autopsy results, an aware woman was killed."
I remain of the opinion that Terri Schiavo was murdered by her piece of crap "husband" and his willing accomplices were the Florida legal system and the major media.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home