Supreme Court debates Florida's execution method (headline)

Just when you thought Florida couldn't get more weird or the law more of an ass.

"Supreme Court justices clashed on Wednesday over how states execute killers, with one court member saying current lethal-injection drugs would not be used on cats and dogs and a second arguing that executions do not have to be pain-free. The court blocked Florida, at the last minute, from executing Clarence Hill in January, as Hill lay on a gurney with IV lines in his arms."

Why, you ask?

Well, Clarence thinks he may suffer before he dies.

"Critics of lethal injection have been bolstered by a 2005 study published in the Lancet medical journal indicating that a painkiller administered at the start of an execution can wear off before a prisoner dies."

"Hill's lawyer, D. Todd Doss, said Hill accepts that he can be executed for slaying police officer Stephen Taylor in the coastal town of Pensacola 24 years ago. Hill just does not want to suffer, Doss said."

Clarence "accepts" this, does he? But the poor ol' murderer doesn't want to suffer.

Clarence Hill...pussy.